Fish on Fire

Le recensioni di Fish on Fire delle persone che hanno visitato e mangiato al ristorante. In base alla valutazione recente.

1. OT

   Utente OpenTable

   Chicago2 recensioni

   1.0

   Visitato il giorno 6 agosto 2018

   1. Complessivo 1
   2. Cibo 3
   3. Servizio 1
   4. Atmosfera 2

   Understaffed. Hibachi will be at least 30 min wait. Ok. Understood. But the staff that did help us didn’t bring our appetizers, then when reminded, they came AFTER the Hibachi and were burned. I mean c’mon. Manager did take off bill, but overall a miserable experience at one of our favorite restaurants. We may be done with this place.
   

   È utile?

2. C

   Chicago123 VIP

   Chicago9 recensioni

   5.0

   Visitato il giorno 22 luglio 2018

   1. Complessivo 5
   2. Cibo 5
   3. Servizio 5
   4. Atmosfera 5

   Very nice restaurant, we were a group of four on what looked like a slow Saturday night for them - service was wonderful, food delicious. We had the asparagus/beef and the jalapeño bomb appetizers, the volcano and an eel roll (forget the name, both great but eel phenomenal), and 3 hibachi dinners: steak/chicken, steak/shrimp and steak/scallop. The guys had their own but we ladies split one of the hibachi dinners - thought might be too much for a whole one each with all the other apps/sides we got - was a perfect amount. Ginger salads and soup came with each hibachi meal. Cocktails good too - we had Geisha Blossoms, Caribbean Sunset (think that’s the name) and a couple of beers and sakes. Would definitely go again and bring the kids.
   

   È utile?

3. OT

   Utente OpenTable

   Chicago5 recensioni

   5.0

   Visitato il giorno 14 luglio 2018

   1. Complessivo 5
   2. Cibo 5
   3. Servizio 5
   4. Atmosfera 5

   Great place to eat as always! Very friendly!
   

   È utile?

4. OT

   Utente OpenTable VIP

   Chicago19 recensioni

   3.0

   Visitato il giorno 12 luglio 2018

   1. Complessivo 3
   2. Cibo 4
   3. Servizio 1
   4. Atmosfera 3

   Great food. Waitress was terrible. She was rude and seemed like we were a bother to her.
   

   È utile?

5. j

   jmd4733

   Chicago11 recensioni

   2.0

   Visitato il giorno 27 giugno 2018

   1. Complessivo 2
   2. Cibo 2
   3. Servizio 1
   4. Atmosfera 1

   Unremarkable. I’ve been here three times. Once my food never was prepared for over an hour and I left without it. Second time I got rancid salmon eggs. Third time, we did their happy hour. The “special” roll deals are half of a regular roll. But not half the price. It’s a fools happy hour. Don’t be a fool!
   

   È utile?

6. R

   Rikola VIP

   Chicago5 recensioni

   4.0

   Visitato il giorno 25 giugno 2018

   1. Complessivo 4
   2. Cibo 4
   3. Servizio 2
   4. Atmosfera 3

   Service was a bit slow at the beginning, but the great food made up for that. I would definitely recommend this restaurant.
   

   È utile?

7. A

   Aleks VIP

   Chicago12 recensioni

   5.0

   Visitato il giorno 14 giugno 2018

   1. Complessivo 5
   2. Cibo 2
   3. Servizio 5
   4. Atmosfera 5

   Very friendly and fun place. We took there our friends visiting from Finland and they had a blast. Oyster shots are fun, food is okay.
   

   È utile?

8. TM

   TMRH

   Chicago62 recensioni

   5.0

   Visitato il giorno 21 maggio 2018

   1. Complessivo 5
   2. Cibo 5
   3. Servizio 5
   4. Atmosfera 5

   So fun both for hibachi and,sushi at the bar. It never disappoints.
   

   È utile?

9. S

   Shiv24 VIP

   Chicago3 recensioni

   2.0

   Visitato il giorno 19 maggio 2018

   1. Complessivo 2
   2. Cibo 1
   3. Servizio 2
   4. Atmosfera 3

   Please see Yelp review.
   

   È utile?

10. MC

    MichelleC VIP

    Chicago34 recensioni

    3.0

    Visitato il giorno 14 maggio 2018

    1. Complessivo 3
    2. Cibo 4
    3. Servizio 1
    4. Atmosfera 4

    It was Mother's Day, so I understand it was a busy night. We showed up a few minutes early for our 7 PM reservation. We were not seated until 7:30, but a party who arrived after us were seated before us. We were assured that our orders would be taken at the same time, but they were not.
    

    È utile?